It's the telling detail, some little
thing that pulls the reader into the scene, making it real, giving
them a visceral reaction.
The character doesn't wear tennis
shoes, he wears black Keds high tops, and when you read that you can
see them. The kitchen doesn't smell of cleaner, it smells of ammonia,
or Fels-Naptha, and the acrid odor bites your nose as you read. He
doesn't smoke a cigar, he smokes an Upman, or chews on a cheap stogie, and
depending on which the author chose, it colors how you see the
character.
It's a dozen little things like that
that carry a scene, a chapter, a book. Not necessarily your brilliant
writing, but your attention to details, the little things.
And just as importantly, your lack of
attention can cripple a scene.
Just finished reading a mostly
delightful mystery – Mr. Churchill's Secretary by Susan Elia
MacNeal. Besides being a decent mystery story with the sort of plucky
heroine it's hard not to like, it's set in wartime London, the
homefront during the Battle of Britain and Churchill gives some of
the most famous speeches ever. I'm a sucker for that kind of stuff,
especially from that era.
The book is a mystery involving a young
woman who becomes a typist and private secretary to Churchill right
after he becomes prime minister. The story has all the requisite
twists and turns and a denouement that doesn't strain credulity too
hard. It's loaded with all the color and detail of life in war time
London as the Luftwaffe fills the skies over England and the bombs
begin to fall. Loads and loads of detail, maybe even a little too
much. Descriptions of the rooms, of the neighborhoods, of the
weather, of the gardens. Even with my love of the period I found
myself skimming, especially when invited to look at yet another room with
dark paneling and thick Persian carpets and large walnut desks and ...
you get the point.
It's not the mass of details – it"s
the right details.
But I was reading along and enjoying it
until I came to this sentence at the beginning of chapter 33. "As
the Moonbeam Orchestra played a cover of Duke Ellington's 'In the
Mood,' Frain ordered champagne."
What? WHAT??!?
Duke Ellington's "In the Mood?"
Is the lady high? OK, that's the sort of mistake anyone could make, I
suppose, although how anyone could mistake Glenn Miller for Duke
Ellington is beyond me. Yes, Ellington's was one of many bands that
recorded the Glenn Miller hit, but it was Miller's song, and that's
so obvious that it's hard to see how anyone could have missed it.
Am I taking this WAY too seriously?
Probably. But it's a good thing the howling error occurred with only
three chapters to go. I stewed over it all the way to the end, as the
book came to its satisfying if somewhat predictable conclusion. If it
had been part of the first time they went out drinking and dancing,
in the early part of the book, I'm pretty sure it would have colored
my enjoyment of the whole book. And it's the kind of thing that makes
you think, "If she got something as simple as that wrong, what
else in this mass of details and description did she get wrong?"
I'll probably read the sequel, but I'll be watching more closely. I'm
not sure I trust the author.
I'm probably an atypical case, but I'd
be willing to bet that anyone who actually sought out the book
because it's about wartime London would have known that and been as
put off as I was.
So when you look for those telling
moments, those critical details, it's probably a good idea to get
them right.